<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Conversation in Faith Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A place for thoughtful, respectful discussion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:19:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Community by Solveig</title>
		<link>http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/community/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Solveig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/?p=779#comment-424</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also had trouble identifying with new communities after a move. In retrospect, I think a community should contribute or help define personal identity. Going to church without interaction doesn&#039;t contribute much to a person&#039;s identity--and going to a church where one feels unacceptable is, perhaps, worse. But if a person feels accepted and loved, community becomes a tangible reality. Perhaps that&#039;s why we feel most connected when we&#039;ve invested ourself--we make emotional connections that shape our attitudes. The same would be true of neighborhoods, schools, work environments, etc. Unfortunately, knowing this doesn&#039;t necessarily pave the way for belonging--I think that experiencing community can be elusive if you--or, in my case, I--can&#039;t quite conform to the norm. I&#039;ll be interested in where you go with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also had trouble identifying with new communities after a move. In retrospect, I think a community should contribute or help define personal identity. Going to church without interaction doesn&#8217;t contribute much to a person&#8217;s identity&#8211;and going to a church where one feels unacceptable is, perhaps, worse. But if a person feels accepted and loved, community becomes a tangible reality. Perhaps that&#8217;s why we feel most connected when we&#8217;ve invested ourself&#8211;we make emotional connections that shape our attitudes. The same would be true of neighborhoods, schools, work environments, etc. Unfortunately, knowing this doesn&#8217;t necessarily pave the way for belonging&#8211;I think that experiencing community can be elusive if you&#8211;or, in my case, I&#8211;can&#8217;t quite conform to the norm. I&#8217;ll be interested in where you go with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Can This Be? Jesus&#8217; Birth by T Crosthwaite</title>
		<link>http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/2008/12/19/how-can-this-be-jesus-birth/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>T Crosthwaite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/?p=321#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, it is not possible to have a meaningful discussion about Jesus if it is based on a misrepresentation.  You do not put new wine in an old bottle.

If the Bible says Jesus was a normal person conceived and born in the normal fashion, then he has nothing in common with the theological Jesus inherited from the Greek Fathers.  That should be fairly obvious.

The religious establishment in Jerusalem in 30AD found Jesus not to their liking and in fact were contemptuous of him.  They proved their point by having him executed.

The Greeks and others subsequently who adopted the NT also found Jesus not to their liking, and accordingly changed him into something he was not - third part of the Trinity, virginally conceived etc.  

The Jerusalem establishment&#039;s crucifixion of Jesus was direct.  The &quot;Christian&quot; churchess stand in much the same position as their Jerusalem counterparts, even though their opposition to the real Jesus is concealed by the image they have wrapped him in.

(The real test is what would happen to Jesus today if he were to appear in similar type circumstances to his first appearance.)

I know what I have said is blunt, but I hope at least it has the virtue of answering your question as to why I &quot;think it is important to deny the virgin birth.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, it is not possible to have a meaningful discussion about Jesus if it is based on a misrepresentation.  You do not put new wine in an old bottle.</p>
<p>If the Bible says Jesus was a normal person conceived and born in the normal fashion, then he has nothing in common with the theological Jesus inherited from the Greek Fathers.  That should be fairly obvious.</p>
<p>The religious establishment in Jerusalem in 30AD found Jesus not to their liking and in fact were contemptuous of him.  They proved their point by having him executed.</p>
<p>The Greeks and others subsequently who adopted the NT also found Jesus not to their liking, and accordingly changed him into something he was not &#8211; third part of the Trinity, virginally conceived etc.  </p>
<p>The Jerusalem establishment&#8217;s crucifixion of Jesus was direct.  The &#8220;Christian&#8221; churchess stand in much the same position as their Jerusalem counterparts, even though their opposition to the real Jesus is concealed by the image they have wrapped him in.</p>
<p>(The real test is what would happen to Jesus today if he were to appear in similar type circumstances to his first appearance.)</p>
<p>I know what I have said is blunt, but I hope at least it has the virtue of answering your question as to why I &#8220;think it is important to deny the virgin birth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Following by Solveig</title>
		<link>http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/following/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Solveig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/?p=773#comment-421</guid>
		<description>A beautiful post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A beautiful post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8220;E&#8221; Word- Evangelism by Solveig</title>
		<link>http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/2009/10/23/the-e-word-evangelism/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Solveig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/?p=764#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Cindy said it all. 

Here&#039;s an experience with the E-word. Many years ago, when I was a new Christian, I was part of an evangelism team that went door to door. After almost an hour, someone let us in. She was more than open and listened to our whole presentation before praying the sinner&#039;s prayer. At that point my partner and I didn&#039;t know what to do. Our personal background had not prepared us.  No one had talked about what to do if someone actually prayed with us. So we left, telling her to come to church.

I cringe every time I think of it. Evangelism should be love-based, and the writer of your book emphasized prayer. Prayer generates true compassion and love. Sounds like a great book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy said it all. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an experience with the E-word. Many years ago, when I was a new Christian, I was part of an evangelism team that went door to door. After almost an hour, someone let us in. She was more than open and listened to our whole presentation before praying the sinner&#8217;s prayer. At that point my partner and I didn&#8217;t know what to do. Our personal background had not prepared us.  No one had talked about what to do if someone actually prayed with us. So we left, telling her to come to church.</p>
<p>I cringe every time I think of it. Evangelism should be love-based, and the writer of your book emphasized prayer. Prayer generates true compassion and love. Sounds like a great book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Will the Neighbors Say? by Solveig</title>
		<link>http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/what-will-the-neighbors-say/#comment-419</link>
		<dc:creator>Solveig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/?p=757#comment-419</guid>
		<description>I like the thought that we should be stunned because God cares what we think about Him. That image is exciting because, it makes no sense that He should care. But if He cared enough to create us, He would care about our destiny--which depends on our thoughts about Him. So there&#039;s the rationale. Yet, it truly is an amazing concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the thought that we should be stunned because God cares what we think about Him. That image is exciting because, it makes no sense that He should care. But if He cared enough to create us, He would care about our destiny&#8211;which depends on our thoughts about Him. So there&#8217;s the rationale. Yet, it truly is an amazing concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8220;E&#8221; Word- Evangelism by Nancy</title>
		<link>http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/2009/10/23/the-e-word-evangelism/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/?p=764#comment-418</guid>
		<description>Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8220;E&#8221; Word- Evangelism by Cindy Hanson</title>
		<link>http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/2009/10/23/the-e-word-evangelism/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/?p=764#comment-417</guid>
		<description>YES!

I am a cook.  I know, not a job people would line up for.  I&#039;ve been snubbed and overlooked plenty of times if I state, &quot;I am a cook&quot;.

But. If I say I feed people. I suddenly become more interesting.  How fascinating it is to meet an articulate chef! Here&#039;s the thing.  I love it. Most days. And I really DO FEED people.  Not just with mass prepared entrees and desserts, but spiritually.  

The best evangelism I have ever seen in myself are the days I just master my day and take care of those around me.  It&#039;s obvious to others I&#039;m God&#039;s girl, I don&#039;t have to beat anyone with a Bible and you know what?  They come to me.

Granted I didn&#039;t read this in a book.  I don&#039;t do it on purpose.  It&#039;s natural for me.  But I really do believe that vocation is the best evangelism technique there is.  Living life like you love it... and here&#039;s the kicker... really loving it!

I meet all kinds in my trade, and it seems to draw its fair share of Type A&#039;s that aren&#039;t afraid to tell you what they think.  One day I was feeling a little bad that I&#039;ve never brought anyone TO church....
then, that very day, one of the other &#039;culinary professionals&#039; who is consistantly grouchy, yells everything, including &#039;hello&#039;... says to me, &quot;I may not believe in your God. But I can tell He loves you.&quot;

It about knocked me over! (He is really crabby) It occurred to me. He does believe. and he sees it... in someone like me! Luckily I don&#039;t have the job of filling pews, but Man! Do I love feeding people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES!</p>
<p>I am a cook.  I know, not a job people would line up for.  I&#8217;ve been snubbed and overlooked plenty of times if I state, &#8220;I am a cook&#8221;.</p>
<p>But. If I say I feed people. I suddenly become more interesting.  How fascinating it is to meet an articulate chef! Here&#8217;s the thing.  I love it. Most days. And I really DO FEED people.  Not just with mass prepared entrees and desserts, but spiritually.  </p>
<p>The best evangelism I have ever seen in myself are the days I just master my day and take care of those around me.  It&#8217;s obvious to others I&#8217;m God&#8217;s girl, I don&#8217;t have to beat anyone with a Bible and you know what?  They come to me.</p>
<p>Granted I didn&#8217;t read this in a book.  I don&#8217;t do it on purpose.  It&#8217;s natural for me.  But I really do believe that vocation is the best evangelism technique there is.  Living life like you love it&#8230; and here&#8217;s the kicker&#8230; really loving it!</p>
<p>I meet all kinds in my trade, and it seems to draw its fair share of Type A&#8217;s that aren&#8217;t afraid to tell you what they think.  One day I was feeling a little bad that I&#8217;ve never brought anyone TO church&#8230;.<br />
then, that very day, one of the other &#8216;culinary professionals&#8217; who is consistantly grouchy, yells everything, including &#8216;hello&#8217;&#8230; says to me, &#8220;I may not believe in your God. But I can tell He loves you.&#8221;</p>
<p>It about knocked me over! (He is really crabby) It occurred to me. He does believe. and he sees it&#8230; in someone like me! Luckily I don&#8217;t have the job of filling pews, but Man! Do I love feeding people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Seeking the truth about truth by A Free Spirit</title>
		<link>http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/seeking-the-truth-about-truth/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>A Free Spirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Is religious truth antipodal to &quot;false&quot;?  Is such truth true in the sense of logic?  If so, is God limited by logic?  I argue in my posts that religious truth is sui generis (i.e., unique).  I&#039;ve been posting on this in conversing with comments and thought you might be interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is religious truth antipodal to &#8220;false&#8221;?  Is such truth true in the sense of logic?  If so, is God limited by logic?  I argue in my posts that religious truth is sui generis (i.e., unique).  I&#8217;ve been posting on this in conversing with comments and thought you might be interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Do We Read the Bible, Historically? by Nancy</title>
		<link>http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/2009/10/03/how-do-we-read-the-bible-historically/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/?p=742#comment-412</guid>
		<description>afrankangle, Thanks for your comments and thanks for continuing to stop by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>afrankangle, Thanks for your comments and thanks for continuing to stop by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Do We Read the Bible, Historically? by afrankangle</title>
		<link>http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/2009/10/03/how-do-we-read-the-bible-historically/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>afrankangle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conversationinfaith.wordpress.com/?p=742#comment-410</guid>
		<description>History is absolutely a matter of perspective. Did we (America) defeat the British in the Revolutionary War or did the British quit and walk away? Did the Anglicans leave the Catholic church or did they get kicked out? To also make a point about perspective, consider reading an article from each city regarding a Sunday NFL game. One would tend to think there were 2 different games played!

There&#039;s also a strong overlap between science and history - especially since scientific process are used to study and verify/disprove recorded events.

In terms of the Bible, when one decides it is all truth, they intentionally two-step around the contradictions - thus I (like you) don&#039;t understand the &quot;must make a choice&quot; concept. 

More importantly, I enjoy reading your posts when I get a chance, as well as many of the comments. I&#039;m no theologian by any imagination, but I am faithful and willing to learn - so thanks for helping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History is absolutely a matter of perspective. Did we (America) defeat the British in the Revolutionary War or did the British quit and walk away? Did the Anglicans leave the Catholic church or did they get kicked out? To also make a point about perspective, consider reading an article from each city regarding a Sunday NFL game. One would tend to think there were 2 different games played!</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a strong overlap between science and history &#8211; especially since scientific process are used to study and verify/disprove recorded events.</p>
<p>In terms of the Bible, when one decides it is all truth, they intentionally two-step around the contradictions &#8211; thus I (like you) don&#8217;t understand the &#8220;must make a choice&#8221; concept. </p>
<p>More importantly, I enjoy reading your posts when I get a chance, as well as many of the comments. I&#8217;m no theologian by any imagination, but I am faithful and willing to learn &#8211; so thanks for helping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
